 |
|
List Archives >
Maple User Group List Archive >
Archive by date >
This Month By Date >
This Month By Topic
[MUG] Comparison of mathematical programs for data analysis
| [MUG] Comparison of mathematical programs for data analysis |
|
Author: Thomas Schramm
Posted: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 10:42:19 +0200
|
>> From: Thomas Schramm "SchrammGeomatik"
Dear Maple User,
I found an updated comparison of the programs
GAUSS, Maple, Mathemnatica, Matlab, MuPAD, 0-Matrix, Ox, Scilab and S-Plus
at
http://www.scientificweb.de/ncrunch/index.html
from Stefan Steinhaus.
I have some doubts that such a comparision of numeric/statistical tools and CAS is very
sensefull, however, one could use this test to compare (at least the numerical aspects of)
the CAS Maple, Mathematica and MuPAD.
At first glance there seem to be some odds concerning Maple.
Although stated, I doubt that Maple 8 was used for testing, since (e.g.) the triple
integration call would not run with Maple 8.
When I looked at the performance tests (algebra) I found that very simple optimizations
lead to significant better performance.
I would be happy to receive some comments on that "comparison".
Tom
--
########################################################################
# Prof. Dr. Thomas Schramm Tel. Kontor : +49 (0)40 428 04 3802 #
# HAW Hamburg privat : +49 (0)40 720 19 16 #
# Fachbereich Geomatik FrisKo : +49 (0)4854 907434 #
# mobil : +49 (0)175 6546861 #
# Hebebrandstr. 1 Fax->Mail : +49 (0)1212 5 10758481 #
# D-22297 Hamburg Fax : +49 (0)40 428 04 3711 #
# "mailto:thomas.schramm" #
# URL http://www.haw-hamburg.de/~schramm #
# Wo? http://www.stadtplandienst.de/query?ORT=hh;STR=Hebebrandstr%2E; #
########################################################################
|
[View Complete Thread]
Previous by date: [MUG] nasty bug in odeplot with macos X, Roberto Sussman
Next by date: [MUG] Re: Pb with GramShmidt, Jmcornil
Previous thread: [MUG] My first program with MAPLE, Marcel Alain
Next thread: [MUG] Re: Pb with GramShmidt, Jmcornil
|
|
|
(NAG)
