Adept Scientific - English
The world's best software and hardware for research, science and engineering.
flag arrow
clearclear

 Adept Store | register Join My Adept | Flags  
Adept Scientific | Amor Way | Letchworth Garden City | Herts | SG6 1ZA | Tel: +44 (0)1462 480055  
UKdedksvnofi
Home
Products
Training
Events
 Buy Online
Downloads
Academic Discounts
Support
My Adept
International |  About Us |  Adept Scientific Blog |  Contact Us |  Press Room |  Jobs
Adept Scientific on Facebook Adept Scientific on Twitter Adept Scientific on YouBube Adept Scientific on LinkedIn


The Next Steps

• Sign up for a Webinar
• Ask us a question
• Buy EndNote
• EndNote Pricing
• Find out about Training
• Download a Brochure
• Download a Demo
• What's on at Adept
• Read our RSS Feeds

Learn More

EndNote Home
EndNote Overview
Using EndNote online?
EndNote Reviews
Running EndNote on a
network

Which bibliography
software is best for me?

Bibliography Software
Comparison Chart


Latest Information

What's New in EndNote
X7

EndNote Basic
View an Online Tutorial
Connection Files
EndNote Import Filters
EndNote Styles
EndNote for iPad
RefScan

Service & Support

Patches and Updates
Looking for EndNote Web?
EndNote Discussion List
Browse the user forum
EndNote FAQs
Search the Knowledge
Base

Technical Support request

List Archives >  EndNote List Archive >  Archive by date >  This Month By Date >  This Month By Topic

Re: APA 6th and seven or more authors

Search email archive for  

Re: APA 6th and seven or more authors
Author: Community Mailer    Posted: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:16:17 -0700
Subject: Re: APA 6th and seven or more authors
Author: myoshigi (Maven)
Date: 10-23-2009 11:15 AM

I agree with John. This change in APA style looks like coming from a big ego of senior authors, complaining their names are not listed when authors are more than 7 or 8. But what is the reason for the cut-off at 7th or 8th? Do they think the third author is more important than 9th author? No way. Obviously, they thought the last author is more important than 9th author, so we should list.   Is this to cut a few lines in the biblio? If they meant space saving effect, then why not list just first and the last author? Why include the second to 7th? If I really want simple and space saving reference, I would list just first (and equal contributing) author, then everybody else is lumped as et al.   In this digital publishing era, cutting a few authors between 7th and the last by doing (....) doesn't save anything. They really should say "list all authors", if senior authors always want their names listed. John is right: it's just ridiculous innovation. Here's my proposal: make the author list circular, so that there aren't first or last author! Then, I'd support EN team to make such an output style... I know it's going to be hard !?   I'm just tired of whole thing about this "order of authorship", by looking at the reference line, saying "you are in the middle", "you are the first", or "you are the last", etc etc etc. Instead, I welcome the recent trend detailing each author's contribution to the study. There are so many cases authors in the middle contributed a lot, and vice versa: authors in the middle didn't do anything to the paper. I think that should be the criteria to "cut them out" and "save space". Not simply by the order in the line, like 7th or 8th.   I stop here before I destroy my day with frustration... Anyway, EN can do the (...) thing. That's the bottom line. Have a nice weekend. Best wishes,


[View Complete Thread]



Previous by date: Single Entry in Bibliography for Chapters in Edited Collections - is this possible?, Community Mailer
Next by date: Connection settings (list of databases) not showing up on Endnote, Community Mailer
Previous thread: Citation issue, Community Mailer
Next thread: Connection settings (list of databases) not showing up on Endnote, Community Mailer



Ready to buy?

Upgrade to EndNote for Windows - DOWNLOAD
IMMEDIATE DOWNLOAD
Add to shopping basket
£ 75.00
EndNote for Windows - DOWNLOAD
IMMEDIATE DOWNLOAD
Add to shopping basket
£ 159.00
Upgrade to EndNote for Mac (OS X) DOWNLOAD
IMMEDIATE DOWNLOAD
Add to shopping basket
£ 75.00
EndNote for Mac (OS X) DOWNLOAD
IMMEDIATE DOWNLOAD
Add to shopping basket
£ 159.00
Click here to buy boxed product.

Featured Downloads

EndNote X7 for Windows Trial
Finding Full Text with EndNote datasheet

Latest Downloads

EndNote X7 Datasheet
EndNote X7 Quick Reference Guide for Windows
EndNote X7 for Windows Trial
EndNote Case Study - Referencing in the Pharmaceutical Industry
EndNote Case Study - Your Health in Their 'Cites'

Product Reviews

"The most powerful citation manager you can find short of a personal librarian."
PC Magazine

"Researchers will find the cost of EndNote covered many times over by their increase in productivity and accuracy."
Science

Latest News

EndNote Case Study - Referencing in the Pharmaceutical Industry
EndNote Case Study - EndNote Makes a Case for Change
EndNote Case Study - Music To a Scholar's Ears
New EndNote for iPad app from Thomson Reuters mobilises the scientific research process
EndNote Case Study - Together for Short Lives
adept

Top of the Page

Popular Links: ChemDraw | ChemOffice | Data Acquisition | Data Analysis | EndNote | Maple | MapleSim | Mathcad | MathType | Quality Analyst | Reference Manager | VisSim

EU ePrivacy Directive | Our Privacy and Terms and Conditions Statement
All Trademarks Recognised. Copyright © 2013, Adept Scientific Ltd.
Site designed and maintained by Lyndon Ash

Adept Scientific | Amor Way | Letchworth Garden City | Herts | SG6 1ZA | Tel: +44 (0)1462 480055